4. Conclusion
The results obtained by the different methods are very interesting.
These tools allow flexible adaptation of the architecture initially
proposed, enabling the reliability engineer to make effective adjustments
to the different architectures newly considered. They also open the
way to more creativity than other tools such as analytical calculation.
In addition, the various common functionalities, including the
step-by-step simulator, make it possible to effectively homologate
the model by ensuring its consistency. Finally, the power of Monte
Carlo simulations produces reliable results for a sufficient number
of simulations.
MissRdP has the undeniable advantage of an easy-to-understand
interface. However, Petri net simulations can be time-consuming if
you want to play a very large number of stories. On this point, AltaRica
3.0 is more optimal,...
You do not have access to this resource.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed?
Log in!
Ongoing reading
Conclusion