Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the article
INTRODUCTION
Qualitative analysis has shown that elasticity has little influence on contact pressure in the case of pointed indenters and/or common metallic materials with a yield stress lower than their Young's modulus. Here, we describe the relationship between plastic flow stress and the hardness of low-hardenability materials, then describe the influence of hardening on the usual indentor shapes: sphere, cone of revolution, pyramid. Finally, we analyze the case of hardness tests carried out on heterogeneous materials, such as thin-film-coated materials or those showing a continuous variation in hardness with distance from the surface (parts subjected to diffusion treatment, for example).
This article is part of a series on hardness testing:
Body hardness and qualitative analysis [M 4 154] ;
Hardness of common metals. Rigid-plastic limit case [M 4 155] ;
Hardness of materials. Influence of elasticity [M 4 156] ;
Hardness of bodies. Analysis of other behaviors [M 4 157] ;
Find out more [Doc. M 4 158].
Most of the symbols used in this article have already been introduced in [M 4 154]. Readers may find it useful to refer to their table of symbols.
You do not have access to this resource.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed?
Log in!
Ongoing reading
Hardness of common metals - Rigid limit case – plastic