Common methods and tools for diagnosis, prognosis and estimation of DEFAD
Data-based methods for fault diagnosis and prognosis – State of the art
Article REF: MT9134 V1
Common methods and tools for diagnosis, prognosis and estimation of DEFAD
Data-based methods for fault diagnosis and prognosis – State of the art

Author : Gilles ZWINGELSTEIN

Publication date: August 10, 2020 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

2. Common methods and tools for diagnosis, prognosis and estimation of DEFAD

Since the beginning of the 21st century, and particularly since the 1950s, when artificial intelligence emerged, tens of thousands of publications, books, specialized conferences and industrial applications have been devoted to the development of a huge number of diagnostic and prognostic methods. This diversity of approaches makes an exhaustive description impossible within the scope of this article. However, we can classify them into two main families: methods based on statistical data processing and those based on the various branches of artificial intelligence (pattern recognition, neural networks, machine learning, etc.).

This section is devoted to a brief description of the principles of the most commonly used methods in these two categories, following a review of machine learning techniques

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Ongoing reading
Common methods and tools for diagnosis, prognosis and estimation of DEFAD

Article included in this offer

"Maintenance"

( 76 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details
Contact us