Conclusion
Hybrid diagnostic and prognostic methods
Article REF: MT9135 V1
Conclusion
Hybrid diagnostic and prognostic methods

Author : Gilles ZWINGELSTEIN

Publication date: January 10, 2021 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

6. Conclusion

The procedure for diagnosing and prognosticating and estimating residual life with hybrid methods combines the advantages and disadvantages of experience-based and knowledge-engineering methods, data-based methods and physical model-based methods. The case studies presented highlight that the components of a hybrid method need to be carefully selected to perform the diagnosis and prognosis for a specific degradation of a given piece of equipment. Selecting the optimum hybrid method for a specific application requires a potential user to meet three major challenges. The first challenge is to determine the best hybrid method based on the data and information available. In theory, the optimal method would correspond to one that requires little information and data on equipment to minimize computational volumes and times. Where data-driven methods do not have sufficient data, they need to be...

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Article included in this offer

"Maintenance"

( 76 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details
Contact us