Reliability-Centered maintenance RCM2? method of John Moubray

Add to my library

SE1660 V1 Article

Reliability-Centered maintenance RCM2? method of John Moubray

Author : Gilles ZWINGELSTEIN

Publication date: September 10, 2015 | Lire en français

Add to my library Add to my library

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

Overview

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the Reliability-Centered Maintenance method RCM2/RCMII developed in 1990 by John Moubray. The RCM2 method was adapted from the RCM method designed by Nowlan and Heap for applications to any industrial asset. Today it serves as the basis for most international standards on RCM. After a description of the origins and the key definitions, the principles of RCM2 are detailed. A practical case then illustrates the approach. Finally a conclusion and recommendations are given to assist the reader in implementation.

Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.

Read the article

AUTHOR

  • Gilles ZWINGELSTEIN : Engineer from the École nationale supérieure d'électrotechnique, d'électronique, d'informatique et d'hydraulique et des télécommunications de Toulouse (ENSEEIHT) - Doctor-Engineer - Doctor of Science - Retired Associate Professor, Université Paris Est Créteil, France

 INTRODUCTION

This article, aimed at readers with a basic knowledge of industrial maintenance, presents the origins, principles and characteristics of the RCM2/RCMII reliability-based maintenance method. This method was developed by John Moubray on the basis of the first RCM (Reliability-Centered Maintenance) method developed by Stanley Nowlan and Howard Heap in 1978 for the aeronautical industry. Following the publication of this method, John Moubray worked with Stanley Nowlan to adapt the initial approach to all industrial sectors. RCM2 is defined by John Moubray as a procedure for determining what needs to be done to ensure that any physical asset continues to achieve what the user desires in its current operating context. The first section presents the origins of his approach, which is intended to be highly pragmatic. The main definitions useful for understanding the RCM2 method have been extracted and translated from John Moubray's RCMII and form the content of the second section. It highlights the significant differences between the definitions used by RCM2 and those advocated in international standards, in particular for FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis). The reasons given by John Moubray for using specific definitions for RCM2 are based on his deliberate desire to use common language terms that are easily understood by maintenance practitioners. The third section covers the seven fundamental questions that need to be answered to obtain the initial RCM2 maintenance plan. These questions will be the subject of specific paragraphs and will concern: functions, modes, causes and consequences of failures. To determine maintenance tasks, other questions concern the importance of failure consequences, the possibility of predicting or preventing failures with proactive maintenance, and what can be implemented in the event that no proactive maintenance task can be used. To illustrate how a reliability-based maintenance study of the RCM2 type can be carried out, the case of a palletizing system with chain conveyors installed in a food carton manufacturing plant will be considered. The first part of the study presents the FMEA table specific to RCM2 to identify functions, functional failures, modes and consequences for the chain conveyor. Then, using the RCM2 decision logic tree, maintenance tasks are presented for the six failure modes of the first function and for the two failure modes associated with the second function. Intervals between maintenance tasks are also proposed.

As feedback from RCM2 implementations shows that it is used by thousands of users in over fifty countries, the final section is devoted to an analysis of the method, and highlights the importance of RCM2. Indeed, it now serves as the basis for many of the standards and recommendations on reliability-based maintenance methods...

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


KEYWORDS

Tools and Methods   |   Maintenance   |   Industrial systems

Ongoing reading
Reliability-Centered maintenance RCM2? method of John Moubray

Article included in this offer

"Safety and risk management"

( 477 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details

Contenus associés

Sur le même sujet

Veille personnalisée : Inscrivez-vous !

Dans les ressources documentaires

Introduction à la fiabilité des structures

Les études d’analyse des risques des structures vieillissantes, industrielles ou de génie civil, et leur ...

La sûreté de fonctionnement : méthodes pour maîtriser les risques

La sûreté de fonctionnement, déclinée maintenant dans tous les secteurs, englobe un grand nombre de métho...

Retour d'expérience technique

Le retour d'expérience technique a pour objectif de collecter, archiver et analyser les informations spéc...

Méthode de maintenance basée sur la fiabilité de la MSG-3

Cet article présente la norme MSG-3 établie par l’ATA (Air Transport Association of America) pour ériger ...

Tous les livres blancs
Toutes les actualités
Contact us