3. Critique of ISO 31010 method no. 29 and future prospects
This third part begins with the criticisms of the method as a high-performance risk management method and, more generally, as a method suited to efficiency in risk and uncertainty management situations, because, as we have seen, it was not designed for this purpose.
Secondly, we summarize the criticisms from the point of view of risk identification, analysis, assessment and treatment.
Paradoxically, there aren't many references in the literature suggesting that ISO 31010 method no. 29 should be re-evaluated to contribute to effective risk management.
...
You do not have access to this resource.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed?
Log in!
Ongoing reading
Critique of ISO 31010 method no. 29 and future prospects