Since the 1990s, investors, developers, managers and users of
office buildings have been paying particular attention to elevator
equipment, whose features contribute to both the quality of life and
the "efficiency" of those who use them.
In office buildings and in general, traffic flows are steadily
increasing and becoming more complex.
For example:
the quest for better internal and external communication
has resulted in more people moving around;
variable working hours and increased staff mobility mean
that peak flows (entry, lunch and exit) are superimposed on heavy
inter-floor traffic;
the presence of several floors requiring catering increases
mid-day traffic.
At the same time, more and more account is being taken of the
time "wasted" in elevators, and it is often necessary to meet the
three a priori antinomic objectives of minimizing elevator congestion
while reducing waiting time (real or perceived) and travel time.The
emergence of new technologies in the 1980's facilitated the development,
for elevators in batteries, of maneuvers other than those with programmable
logic, new maneuvers that could better reconcile the reduction of
equipment congestion, waiting time and travel time. While maneuvers
with programmable logic are still in use, and the corresponding studies
can be carried out in accordance with the approach below, the emergence
of other methods of managing user calls and elevators in a battery
implies different traffic studies. See
3
for details of these differences.
In all cases, the same analysis scheme should be used as in the
previous dossier
:
Now that these points have been determined as precisely as possible,
it is time to make some working hypotheses: