4. Conclusion
The explanation of the proposed branding architecture is perhaps not detailed enough to avoid some people thinking it's a new label.
To avoid any confusion, three additional points need to be made.
-
In terms of performance, evaluation does not imply relevance.
Existing labels are primarily designed for evaluation purposes. This presupposes the existence of a reference framework and the designation of reference values.
The aim is therefore to determine a level of performance that is, in a way, reified, since the object of investigation is generally limited to a single aspect of operation (monocriteria), independently of other parameters. Attempts at a multi-criteria approach are underway, but are slower to materialize, given the interdependence of the factors analyzed.
The proposed branding does not take this approach, and focuses primarily...
You do not have access to this resource.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed?
Log in!
Ongoing reading
Conclusion