Room acoustics is a discipline that requires a wealth of knowledge in a wide variety of fields. The number of variables conditioning a given configuration is considerable. It is therefore important to prioritize them and select the most relevant for a given purpose. This remark is all the more justified in that the models involved are numerous and, most of the time, incompatible.
The major difficulty with this discipline is that no physical model can describe or predict the behavior of a sound wave in an enclosed space (see
[C 3 360]
§ 1.11).
This deficiency can only be compensated for by bringing into play a myriad of formulas, sometimes geometric, sometimes undulatory, sometimes statistical, sometimes psychophysical, sometimes analogical, sometimes empirical...
The "connection" of these formulas is an operation whose complexity is only suspected by specialists. As a result, the only way to be operational in adapting a room to a given purpose is to know all the laws relating to architectural acoustics, and to master their choice and implementation. It is the role of methodology to enable the acquisition and implementation of this mastery.
With this in mind, three methods will be proposed: the systematic approach [BR 1 010], the model-based approach
[BR 1 012]
and the linearized approach
[BR 1 014]
.
The systematic approach [BR 1 010] consists in listing, in chronological order, all the steps required to characterize a room. This is the approach required of any acoustical engineer tasked with optimizing a room for a given purpose: listening, insulation, soundproofing, comfort, etc.
The model-based approach