Overview
ABSTRACT
In order to assess the risk of pipe leakage, one of the most commonly used method consists in using a linear frequency of occurrence stemming from the statistic analysis of feedback and extracted from a database. This easy to implement solution is not however optimal as it does not take into account the specificities of a site or an activity. It is thus essential to dispose of a weighting method in order to obtain a more precise quantification. According to the specificities of the system which is studied and notably the risks linked to hazardous events such as loss of containment, this method allows for upwards or downwards variations from the data available in the databases.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Olivier IDDIR : Industrial risk analysis engineer - Technip France - Expertise and Modeling Department - Processes and Technologies Division
INTRODUCTION
Pipeline leaks account for a significant proportion of the dreaded events identified in risk analyses carried out as part of French regulatory studies (hazard studies), but also as part of so-called QRA (quantitative risk assessment) studies.
To quantify the occurrence of a pipe leak, one of the most commonly used methods is to extract a so-called linear frequency of occurrence (/year · m) from a database, and multiply it by the pipe metre. The main advantage of this approach is that it is relatively simple to implement. However, a number of questions arise regarding the use of "average" values reported in databases. We need to distinguish between two types of database:
sector-specific databases, such as EGIG 6 th for gas transmission pipelines, or UKOPA 4 th for hydrocarbon transmission pipelines;
multi-sector" databases, such as the CPR 18 E, better known as the Purple Book.
Using the leakage frequencies reported by EGIG 6 th as part of a risk analysis for a gas transmission pipeline is not a priori problematic, since the values reported in this database are specific to this sector of activity. In other words, the values reported in this database are good estimators of leak frequencies. On the other hand, when you want to assess the frequency of pipe leaks in an industry not covered by a specific database, the question arises as to how representative the values are. Indeed, how can we judge whether the value reported in the database is too pessimistic, or on the contrary too optimistic, with regard to the various causes of leakage and prevention measures identified during the risk analysis? Being able to deviate upwards or downwards from the values reported in the databases is therefore necessary if we wish to carry out a specific risk analysis, taking into account the particularities of the system under study (nature and intensity of the causes that could lead to the leak, performance of the prevention measures implemented by the manufacturer, etc.).
This article reviews the current state of knowledge on the subject of weighting leakage frequencies in quantified risk analysis.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!
Leakage frequency weighting within the framework of industrial risks anlysis
Bibliography
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!
Article included in this offer
"Safety and risk management"
(
477 articles
)
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources