Memory breakdown and increasing vulnerability to disasters

Add to my library

P4239 V1 Article

Memory breakdown and increasing vulnerability to disasters

Author : Emmanuel GARNIER

Publication date: December 10, 2020 | Lire en français

Add to my library Add to my library

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

Overview

ABSTRACT

The aim is to show how forgetting the disasters of the past contributes to increasing exposure to risks in our societies. It first addresses the question of historical materials and methods and emphasizes the role of expert speech and modeling, as almost revealed truth and irrefutable proof of the unprecedented nature of a catastrophe. In practice, such a posture often leads to unpreparedness in the face of the coming disaster and to a form of routine risk management, as evidenced by the examples of the flood risk in Paris, the Xynthia storm of 2010 and, more recently still, the Covid 19 crisis. These weaknesses demonstrated, it is finally important to propose other horizons capable of reducing vulnerability.

Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.

Read the article

AUTHOR

  • Emmanuel GARNIER : CNRS Research Director, UMR 6249 CNRS Chrono-environnement, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France

 INTRODUCTION

Written in the midst of the Covid-19 epidemic, the content of this article was inevitably shaped by this catastrophe, which served as a brutal reminder of the extent to which lack of anticipation and forgetting the past can lead to unpreparedness and jeopardize a rapid recovery. Often presented by the authorities, experts and the media as "unprecedented" and therefore unpredictable, this crisis is a masterly illustration of the growing vulnerability of our societies caused by a generalized breakdown in memory. Using the experience of the past as a sieve, and from a perspective specific to the historical sciences, this work aims to highlight the resulting exposure of our contemporaries to risk, and the limits of the word of the contemporary expert, whether scientist, engineer or political decision-maker. In this way, it is possible to understand at what point these words become hegemonic and legitimate in the face of short-term budgetary and political diktats, to the point of eradicating the memory of a disaster that had, until then, been preserved in diverse and original forms. We also need to assess these memorial expressions in order to judge their relevance and, possibly, their integration into more sustainable adaptation strategies for the future, if only in the form of series of events historically demonstrated and known in current models and prevention plans.

The aim of this article is therefore to provide new avenues for reflection, based as they are on past experience and transdisciplinarity, to reduce the vulnerabilities that engineers, planners, entrepreneurs, insurers and political leaders are facing or will face in the future when it comes to risk. The historical approach to disasters is conceived here as a tool for reinforcing the modes of governance of human societies and companies induced by the globalization process of the last twenty years, by promoting more efficient coordination of collective action, because it is rooted in the long term and respects diversity.

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Ongoing reading
Memory breakdown and increasing vulnerability to disasters

Article included in this offer

"Quality manager"

( 223 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details
Contact us