7. REACH's role in the science/society debate
It should be noted that, at the same time, REACH has "catalyzed" broader reflection, particularly of a societal nature. It should be remembered that, prior to the introduction of the regulation, States were responsible for defining high-risk products, and it is estimated that, for 86% of substances placed on the market, information on risks to human health and the environment was insufficient. A profound change in culture is now taking place, based on the premise that "no data = no market", and that the burden of demonstrating the safety of products put on sale falls on the marketer (producer or importer); furthermore, the regulation stipulates that information must be provided throughout the chain, from producer to consumer. Civil society will find itself obliged to accept a slightly higher cost for products that are guaranteed to be healthier, but will also be obliged to make judgments...
You do not have access to this resource.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed?
Log in!
Ongoing reading
REACH's role in the science/society debate