Limitations of RUL estimation methods
Predictive maintenance : technologies and methods
Article REF: MT9573 V1
Limitations of RUL estimation methods
Predictive maintenance : technologies and methods

Author : Gilles ZWINGELSTEIN

Publication date: August 10, 2025 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

8. Limitations of RUL estimation methods

The accuracy of remaining useful life (RUL) estimates and probabilistic failure predictions depends on a number of determining factors relating to the data, the methods used and the operating context. Firstly, data quality plays a fundamental role in the reliability of predictions. Secondly, modeling and the choice of algorithms directly influence the accuracy of estimates. The adoption of physical, statistical or artificial intelligence-based models must be adapted to the volume and diversity of the data available. Machine learning approaches, although powerful, require a representative learning base to avoid bias and guarantee reliable predictions.

Furthermore, the temporal evolution of systems requires regular updating of models to avoid obsolescence. On-line learning enables predictions to be adjusted in line with new data and changing operating conditions....

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Article included in this offer

"Maintenance"

( 76 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details
Contact us