Suggestions for improving the MBSA methodology
Experimenting with the MBSA methodology using the AltaRica language
Article REF: SE8260 V1
Suggestions for improving the MBSA methodology
Experimenting with the MBSA methodology using the AltaRica language

Authors : Pierre SAMMUT, David MAILLAND

Publication date: June 10, 2021 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

5. Suggestions for improving the MBSA methodology

Various avenues for improvement were raised during the course of this article. First of all, fault trees are tools widely used by engineers in the field of operational safety. They are generated by MBSA tools, but in an order that escapes any human-understandable logic. Indeed, when a RAMS engineer constructs a fault tree, it must be ordered in a logical, comprehensible and verifiable way, which is still far from being the case for a tree generated by MBSA tools. For the future, we can only hope that the engineers in charge of developing these tools will focus on the way fault trees are constructed. The generation of trees from MBSA models would then be fast and verifiable, allowing reliability engineers to do away with the tedious step of tree construction: putting this into practice would make the MBSA methodology more mature.

There is a need for harmonization...

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Ongoing reading
Suggestions for improving the MBSA methodology

Article included in this offer

"Safety and risk management"

( 461 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details
Contact us