Overview
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Yves MORTUREUX: Ponts et Chaussées civil engineer - Expert in operating safety for SNCF's Operating Systems and Safety Division - Vice-Chairman of the Institute for Dependable Operations
INTRODUCTION
Operating safety (as explained in the articles Operating safety: methods for controlling risks and Dependability: approaches to risk management ) in the service of risk management, describes the mechanisms that lead to incidents and accidents. This discipline naturally includes methods designed to represent the logic of combinations of facts or conditions that have led, are leading or could lead to incidents or accidents.
It's hardly surprising, then, that tree representations are among the most common tools used in dependability analysis. In this article, we present the three most common methods: the fault tree, the cause tree and the event tree.
What these three methods have in common is that they produce tree-like representations of the logic of a system (or part of it). This superficial similarity is misleading: these three methods meet distinctly different needs, and the trees produced do not contain the same information. This resemblance in form and, naturally, in name has motivated us to present them together, to help the reader distinguish between them.
So these three methods should not be taken as variants of the same method, or as three ways of carrying out the same reasoning, but as three different methods.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!
Fault, cause and event trees
Article included in this offer
"Safety and risk management"
(
460 articles
)
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Bibliography
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!