Conclusion
Coq, proof assistant
Article REF: H3310 V1
Conclusion
Coq, proof assistant

Authors : Sandrine Blazy, Pierre Castéran, Hugo Herbelin

Publication date: August 10, 2017 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

6. Conclusion

Proof assistants such as Coq make it possible to produce safe software despite its complexity. Clearly, not every program needs to be formally verified, but the number of applications that need to be safe justifies the emergence of a profession we can call proof engineering, which requires skills in both logic and software engineering.

Among the various proof assistants, Coq stands out for its reliability, extensive standard library, and a large number of interactive proof tactics.

Its complexity might frighten off the novice user, but it's not Coq that's too complicated, but the rigorous proof, particularly of algorithms and programs, which requires sufficiently comprehensive tools.

SCROLL...
You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Ongoing reading
Conclusion

Article included in this offer

"Software technologies and System architectures"

( 227 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details