Conclusion
Optimization and reliability of the Hydroforming process
Quizzed article REF: BM5035 V1
Conclusion
Optimization and reliability of the Hydroforming process

Author : Abdelkhalak EL HAMI

Publication date: October 10, 2020, Review date: January 13, 2021 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

7. Conclusion

In shaping, uncertainties are often taken into account by defining safety coefficients. This generates additional costs, and ensures neither reliability nor stability of the process. The main reason for resorting to this intuitive concept is the absence of a clear strategy for assessing the probability of process failure. Assessing process reliability is often difficult, given the non-linearities of the problem, implicit limit states and the absence of a probabilistic characterization of uncertain parameters. In this paper, we propose an innovative strategy that does not depend on the type of process or finite element code. This approach enables the probability of failure likely to occur to be assessed using metamodels. It overcomes the difficulties associated with safety coefficients and exploits the formability or feasibility domain to the full.

In this article,...

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Article included in this offer

"Metal forming and foundry"

( 122 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details