9. Mistakes to avoid
9.1 Don't think of patent nullity as a competitive tool
It would be a mistake to think that an action for annulment is a means of weakening a competitor's portfolio or "pressuring" him, without having to justify a direct and personal interest in taking action for annulment. An abusive action may give rise to an award of damages.
In addition, while a claim for invalidity is the classic response to an infringement action, conversely, a person who voluntarily acts to invalidate a patent exposes himself to counterclaims for infringement from the patentee.
SCROLL TO TOPExclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Management and innovation engineering
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Mistakes to avoid
Bibliography
Also in our database
Bibliography
F. Pollaud-Dulian, La propriété industrielle: Economica, coll. Corpus droit privé, 2011
P. Roubier, Le droit de la propriété industrielle , t. 2, Paris Sirey 1954
I. Romet, B. Vuillermoz, Novelty and inventive activity , Centre Paul Roubier, 22-1-2015
Websites
Office européen des brevets (OEB)
The European Patent Office is one of the organs of the European Patent Organization. It is responsible for granting European patents (EPC article 43).
A self-financed public institution under the supervision...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference