Conclusion
Acoustic perception and sound quality
Article REF: R6140 V1
Conclusion
Acoustic perception and sound quality

Author : Étienne PARIZET

Publication date: December 10, 2006 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

4. Conclusion

Despite all the work carried out to establish these indicators, they must be treated with caution when it comes to building an amenity model. Zwicker et al. have proposed universal indicators supposed to represent the annoyance of any sound, and calculated from the elementary indicators outlined above. Of course, these indicators should be treated with caution, for two reasons. Firstly, they assume that the elementary indicators have good precision, which, as we have seen, is not true at least for roughness. Secondly, they totally disregard the significance that noise can have, which can strongly influence its assessment.

You should also be very cautious about the approaches proposed by some manufacturers of perceptual analysis software. This approach consists in conducting a perceptual test and calculating the whole battery of available indicators (of which this...

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Ongoing reading
Conclusion

Article included in this offer

"Noise and vibration"

( 71 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details