Example 3: compensating for the failure of a classic law
Methodological guide for the acoustic study of rooms. Approach by models
Article REF: BR1012 V1
Example 3: compensating for the failure of a classic law
Methodological guide for the acoustic study of rooms. Approach by models

Author : Jacques JOUHANEAU

Publication date: April 10, 2010, Review date: June 6, 2024 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

3. Example 3: compensating for the failure of a classic law

Many of the models used to describe the behavior of sound in a room are based on statistical laws. This choice is easily explained by the fact that, beyond a critical distance, the dominant field is the reverberant field. However, this critical distance is always very small compared to the dimensions of the room (for the meeting room in the first example, it remains less than 1 m even after treatment).

All the laws relating to the reverberant field (starting with Sabine's formula) are based on the principle of homogeneous diffusion. However, homogeneous diffusion is rarely observed in reality, even in relatively regular rooms. In irregular rooms, we can therefore find ourselves in situations where the classical laws become grossly false. The simplest case of an irregular room is that of a long room (X >> Y, Z).

...

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Ongoing reading
Example 3: compensating for the failure of a classic law

Article included in this offer

"Noise and vibration"

( 71 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details