Conclusion
Environmental taxation
Archive REF: G1066 V1
Conclusion
Environmental taxation

Author : Sylvie SCHMITT

Publication date: November 10, 2020 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

6. Conclusion

A study of the main environmental taxes shows that there is no coherent environmental tax policy based on a single model. This is primarily due to the fact that environmental taxation has been grafted onto the existing fiscal tax system. It seemed simpler to green either taxes that were essentially excise taxes (taxes on a specific product, e.g. TICPE) or similar to excise taxes (e.g. water charges), or to green taxes targeting a specific activity (e.g. TEOM). In a way, legislators have "recycled" the existing system by adapting it to new challenges.

A second reason for the lack of unity in France's environmental tax system is that environmental policy has developed gradually, under the impetus of the European Union and the successive directives it has adopted in specific areas (energy, waste, toxic substances, etc.). French legislators have designed environmental...

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Article included in this offer

"Environment"

( 515 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details
Contact us