Diagnosis and failure prognosis methods based on hybrid methods

Add to my library

MT9135 V1 Article

Diagnosis and failure prognosis methods based on hybrid methods

Author : Gilles ZWINGELSTEIN

Publication date: January 10, 2021 | Lire en français

Add to my library Add to my library

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

Overview

ABSTRACT

This article provides an overview of the main hybrid methods developed for the  diagnostic and the prognosis of failures in the frame  of  the CBM/PHM. Their principles are based on the joint use of methods based on experience, knowledge, data and physical models. After a reminder of terminology, their classification and content are detailed. Four examples of applications are then presented. The article concludes on their benefits and disadvantages.

Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.

Read the article

AUTHOR

  • Gilles ZWINGELSTEIN : Engineer from the École nationale supérieure d'électrotechnique, d'électronique, d'informatique et d'hydraulique et des télécommunications de Toulouse (ENSEEIHT), Doctor of Engineering, Doctor of Science, retired Associate Professor of Universities, Université Paris-Est

 INTRODUCTION

For operators of industrial processes, monitoring the state of health of their equipment is one of the major preoccupations in avoiding plant downtime. With this in mind, numerous methods and tools have been developed over the last few decades to detect the onset of deterioration, perform diagnostics and estimate the remaining service life before failure (DEFAD, RUL). The vast majority of them rely exclusively on experience and knowledge, data or physical models. This article presents a state-of-the-art review of hybrid methods that combine the advantages of the previous methods for failure diagnosis and prognosis. To avoid any ambiguity in the terms used in this article, the first section presents the main definitions and terminologies proposed by ISO and NF-EN international standards (ISO 13372:2012, ISO 13379-1 ISO 13381-1, ISO 16079-1 and NF EN 13306). The second section, after a brief reminder of the issues involved and the main steps involved, presents the general principles of hybrid methods. This is followed by a brief review of the main features of the elementary experience- and knowledge-based methods, data-based methods and physical model-based methods required to develop hybrid methods. As the various hybrid methods described in the literature are based on the serial or parallel combination of the preceding elementary methods, the third section presents their classification into five categories proposed by Linxia Liao. This typology takes into account: 1) methods based on experience, knowledge and data; 2) methods based on experience, knowledge and physics-based models; 3) methods based on multiple data processing; 4) methods based on data and physics-based models; 5) methods based on experience, knowledge, data and physics-based models.

To illustrate the diversity of hybrid approaches and their effectiveness, the fourth section presents four case studies. The first case concerns a hybrid method using data and physical models to predict the erosion of a choke valve in a subsea oil facility. It implements a procedure that uses data smoothing by autoregressive models, a standard neural network and a reliability model based on the Gamma law. The second case proposes a method for predicting the reliability of a ball bearing, using several data processing methods (principal component analysis, PCA and logistic regression). As the reliability of lithium-ion batteries plays an important role in the storage and supply of electrical energy, the third case proposes a method for predicting the charge capacity of a lithium battery, based on ARMA autoregressive models and neural networks. The last case proposes a method for modeling crack propagation speed without knowledge of propagation laws, with a view to RUL prediction. It uses a hybrid method based on a representation model and a neural...

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


KEYWORDS

diagnostic   |   methods   |   prognosis   |   RUL

Ongoing reading
Diagnosis and failure prognosis methods based on hybrid methods

Article included in this offer

"Maintenance"

( 78 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details
Contact us