ABSTRACT
Diverging views have been expressed regarding the extent of the traceability obligation. Limited for some and vast for others, this divergence is likely to entail managerial consequences and therefore costs or legal sanctions. In order to simplify the subject matter, this article starts by presenting the analysis of obligatory texts dealing with traceability in compliance with the rules of statutory interpretation that a judge would use. The diverging interpretations are independently dealt with in the appendix.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the article
AUTHOR
-
Henri TEMPLE
: Lawyer, international expert - Director of the Centre du droit de la consommation et du marché (CDCM), the Master in Consumer Affairs and the European Master for Consumer Affairs (EMCA) at the University of Montpellier.
INTRODUCTION
Opinions differ as to the extent of the traceability obligation.
The scope may be limited for some, or very broad for others, with managerial consequences – and consequent costs – or legal sanctions.
To avoid making for difficult reading, it is preferable to begin with an analysis of the mandatory texts dealing with traceability, in line with the rules of interpretation that the judge is likely to use. For sooner or later, it is the judge who will have the last word.
It's only in an appendix devoted to arguments to the contrary (prolepses) that we will discuss and –– hopefully refute the different interpretations once and for all.
You do not have access to this resource.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed?
Log in!
Ongoing reading
Traceability of food and non-food products: extent of constraints