2. Prolepses and axiomatic refutation of contra legem opinions
There are interpretations of the 2001 directive and 2002 regulation that run counter to what most legal experts would expect. However, this is the interpretation set out in the first paragraph.
These opposing interpretations relate to :
on the scope of the traceability obligation;
how long traceability data is kept.
However, this last question has already been explained, as has the refutation of contrary opinions on this point.
Three divergent interpretations from three different organizations have been identified:
the report of the Conseil national de l'alimentation CNA (France) of July 5, 2004;
two memos from the Direction Générale de l'Alimentation...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!
Prolepses and axiomatic refutation of contra legem opinions
Article included in this offer
"Traceability"
(
56 articles
)
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Bibliography
Also in our database
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!