3. Comparison of the two approaches
3.1 Selected configuration
A fictitious petrochemical plant is shown in figure 17 . It is assumed to be filled with a cloud of propane in stoichiometric concentration with air (31,000 m 3 ). Three ignition positions are assumed.
For each of the objectives below, a multi-energy approach and a CFD approach will be used.
SCROLL TO TOP
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Safety and risk management
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Comparison of the two approaches
Conclusion
Bibliography
Software tools
AUTOREAGAS, CFX, FLUENT. ANSYS INC. Southpointe 275 Technology Drive Canonsburg, PA 15317, USA http://www.ansys.com
FLACS – FLame Acceleration Simulator. GEXCON AS Fantoftvegen 38 N-5892 Bergen, Norway http://www.gexcon.com
Regulations
Environment Code – consolidated version as of June 1, 2012
Law no. 2003-699 of 30/07/03 on the prevention of technological and natural risks and the repair of damage, JO no. 175 of 31 July 2003, NOR: DEVX0200176L
Arrêté du 29 septembre 2005 relatif à " l'évaluation et à la prise en compte de la probabilité d'occurrence, de la cinétique, de l'intensité des effets et de la gravité...
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
