Conclusion
CFD-multi-energy comparison for modeling explosions
Article REF: SE5069 V1
Conclusion
CFD-multi-energy comparison for modeling explosions

Author : Anousone CHAMPASSITH

Publication date: January 10, 2013 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

4. Conclusion

When considering the risk of explosion, different degrees of precision are required in modeling the effects. For some problems, defining a distance to an overpressure threshold will suffice, while for others, full characterization of the overpressure signal will be essential. Today, there are many tools available for dealing with this phenomenon. In practice, two approaches are the most widely used today: the multi-energy method and CFD methods (FLACS in particular).

From a technical point of view, CFD methods perform better overall, since they model physical phenomena more accurately. However, most of today's commercial CFD codes have limitations that can lead, among other things, to an underestimation of the effects of explosions far from the flammable cloud, which is precisely what the multi-energy method is designed to address. In fact, to date, the two methods...

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Article included in this offer

"Safety and risk management"

( 461 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details
Contact us