Comparative studies of expert judgement criticality methods
Equipment criticality assessment - Methods of using expert judgements
Article REF: SE4004 V1
Comparative studies of expert judgement criticality methods
Equipment criticality assessment - Methods of using expert judgements

Author : Gilles ZWINGELSTEIN

Publication date: April 10, 2014 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

7. Comparative studies of expert judgement criticality methods

In the absence of formalized feedback, collective expert judgment is the only possible way of determining criticality, using one of the above methods. The grid in table 5 gives the most useful characteristics for choosing a method for determining equipment criticality. Analysis of this grid shows that the brainstorming method performs less well. This can be explained by the fact that this method relies on superficial knowledge, in the sense of artificial intelligence expert systems [H 1 990] , and does not use an iterative method of consulting experts. The Delphi and Régnier methods, which use dedicated software to iteratively mobilize...

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Ongoing reading
Comparative studies of expert judgement criticality methods

Article included in this offer

"Safety and risk management"

( 461 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details
Contact us