Conclusion
Equipment criticality assessment - Methods of using expert judgements
Article REF: SE4004 V1
Conclusion
Equipment criticality assessment - Methods of using expert judgements

Author : Gilles ZWINGELSTEIN

Publication date: April 10, 2014 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

8. Conclusion

The heuristic methods we have just described for defining the criticality of equipment in the absence of experience feedback based on expert judgement, use principles that are more or less based on scientific approaches. Most of these techniques call on a panel of experts led by a moderator. The role of this facilitator is vital, as it is usually an experienced person who will define the questionnaire and manage the modes of communication between the various partners present at the meeting or contacted by other means. It's worth noting that most consensus-building techniques use an iterative procedure, in which the facilitator uses a variety of questions to try and reach a consensus on the problems to be solved. Feedback from the use of these methods, in particular the Delphi, Régnier, Pieu or Ishikawa methods, shows that there will never be a perfect consensus, and that there is always...

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Article included in this offer

"Safety and risk management"

( 460 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details
Contact us