Overview
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Jean-Pierre SIGNORET: Dependability specialist - Former chairman of UTE's UF56 commission (operating safety), then of AFNOR (French standards association) - IEC 61025 project manager – Fault tree - Member of TOTAL associate professors - 64160 Sedzère, France
INTRODUCTION
This article on fault trees (ADDs) follows on from
However, when components evolve independently of each other over time, it is still possible, to a certain extent, to take some temporal aspects into account with this approach. This is the subject of this article, which explains how ADD makes it easy to calculate the unavailability, U(t), of the modeled system as a function of the unavailabilities of its components, U i (t). It also explains how ADD can be used, albeit with more complicated calculations, to obtain the failure frequency, w(t), and the defiabilty, F(t), of the system under study (probability of observing a failure over the duration [0, t]). ADD calculation of the defiabilty, F(t), is generally not possible without approximation.
For a long time, these calculations were limited by the size of the ADDs considered, the power of the computers available and the low efficiency of the algorithms used in the presence of elements repeated several times in the models. These limitations have been overcome since the implementation of binary decision diagrams (BDD). This was first put to good use in the static case
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!
Fault tree
Article included in this offer
"Safety and risk management"
(
460 articles
)
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Bibliography
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!