Critique of ISO 31010 method no. 29 and future prospects
Criticism of the consequence
Article REF: C8109 V1
Critique of ISO 31010 method no. 29 and future prospects
Criticism of the consequence

Authors : Francis CLAUDE, Sébastien NOUET

Publication date: October 10, 2016 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

3. Critique of ISO 31010 method no. 29 and future prospects

This third part begins with the criticisms of the method as a high-performance risk management method and, more generally, as a method suited to efficiency in risk and uncertainty management situations, because, as we have seen, it was not designed for this purpose.

Secondly, we summarize the criticisms from the point of view of risk identification, analysis, assessment and treatment.

3.1 Other reviews identified

Paradoxically, there aren't many references in the literature suggesting that ISO 31010 method no. 29 should be re-evaluated to contribute to effective risk management.

...
You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Ongoing reading
Critique of ISO 31010 method no. 29 and future prospects

Article included in this offer

"Construction law and general management"

( 77 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details
Contact us