Conclusion
EMR: Multi-physical Formalism for Control of Energetic Systems
Quizzed article REF: D3066 V1
Conclusion
EMR: Multi-physical Formalism for Control of Energetic Systems

Authors : Walter LHOMME, Philippe DELARUE, Alain BOUSCAYROL, Philippe BARRADE

Publication date: November 10, 2014, Review date: March 1, 2021 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

3. Conclusion

Macroscopic energy representation has a number of advantages for engineers wishing to model, analyze and control multi-disciplinary energy systems. Using this approach, a system is studied as a whole (systemic approach) and not in a decomposed way (reductionist approach). The systemic approach also enables us to resolve conflicts of association between sub-systems. As a result of its development, REM requires engineers to think differently, by organizing the causes and effects of a system. This "good" organization guarantees better analysis of energy flows.

One of the real strengths of REM is, without doubt, its ability to systematically deduce an order structure. Several rules have been introduced for this purpose. The control structure can be deduced from the REM formalism itself. Control can then be broken down into two levels: local and global. The role of the...

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Article included in this offer

"Conversion of electrical energy"

( 273 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details
Contact us