Mistakes to avoid
Hazard studies: databases and weighting of values
Practical sheet REF: FIC0541 V1
Mistakes to avoid
Hazard studies: databases and weighting of values

Author : Olivier IDDIR

Publication date: September 10, 2012, Review date: November 27, 2016 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

6. Mistakes to avoid

6.1 Don't apply a type 1 approach using a statistical distribution from a sector of activity other than the one under study.

As with database frequencies, a statistical breakdown can only be transposed if the sectors of activity are "similar". Indeed, the "weight" of causes may differ from one sector to another, due to operating or process conditions. For example, if a statistical distribution reports that on an offshore installation 10% of small breaches are linked to corrosion, this result may not be representative of an onshore installation (or at least it is not possible to demonstrate this). Applying this coefficient could lead to an erroneous calculation of the "weighted" leak frequency.

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Article included in this offer

"Chemical risk prevention manager"

( 218 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details