Conclusion - Advice
Modeling and identification of a steelmaking process
Archive REF: R7142 V1
Conclusion - Advice
Modeling and identification of a steelmaking process

Authors : Jacques RICHALET, Denis STIEVENART

Publication date: July 10, 1994, Review date: September 16, 2024 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

8. Conclusion - Advice

Identification is not just a matter of using a "miracle" algorithm on data collected by applying any test protocol (pseudo-random binary signals). Representing a real physical process using a mathematical operator is always a hazardous operation (non-linearities, non-stationarity, disturbance, noise, variability of operating conditions, etc.).

Remember that all models are "wrong", but that doesn't mean that some can't be "useful", if we know how to adapt their establishment conditions to their subsequent use.

Identification must proceed through a series of steps, of equal importance in terms of their potential harm, if not carried out correctly. The most critical part, however, both methodologically and operationally, is clearly in the optimal choice of test protocol, which will ask the process the relevant questions. If there is no information...

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Ongoing reading
Conclusion - Advice

Article included in this offer

"Control and systems engineering"

( 143 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details