Discussion
Comparative study of three approaches of measurements uncertainties evaluation GUM, GUM S1 and GLOBALE
Article REF: R286 V1
Discussion
Comparative study of three approaches of measurements uncertainties evaluation GUM, GUM S1 and GLOBALE

Authors : Abdelali MOHAMMADI, Youssef EL HACHIMI, Samira MARICHANE, Abdallah MOUAD

Publication date: June 10, 2019 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

5. Discussion

From these results, it was found that there is no significant difference between the resulting expanded uncertainties (at 95% confidence levels) obtained with GUM and GUM S1 (Monte-Carlo). These results are due to the linearity of the mathematical model for pH measurement. In the case of model non-linearity, there is likely to be a significant difference. For quality assurance purposes, it is advisable to run these two calculations in parallel to check the results.

In addition, the GUM and GUM S1 (Monte-Carlo) approaches lead to lower values than the global approach, because the global approach assesses uncertainties about the method (uncertainty about a single measurement is included), which implies that all sources of uncertainty are taken into account and overestimated, so the global approach takes into account the real daily variation observed in a laboratory....

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Article included in this offer

"Instrumentation and measurement methods"

( 50 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details