Overview
ABSTRACT
Fire safety in transportation is one key parameter in the design of vehicles and related infrastructure. Its objectives are both to make fire less likely, and to reduce its impact to ensure safe evacuation of the public. Fire scenarios in transportation are many and varied, often characterized by very short egress times, and small volumes, which increase the risk for people. This article details the requirements in terms of reaction-to-fire and fire resistance of materials for the main types of transport. Regulatory provisions and tests are also specified for each one.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Eric GUILLAUME: General Manager, Efectis, Saint-Aubin, France
INTRODUCTION
In the transport sector, fire safety has always been a key issue, due to the variety of possible fire scenarios and the social and economic impact of these events. In contrast to other sectors, such as construction, fire scenarios are characterized by generally short emergency response times and confined spaces, often involving the exposure of people.
Thus, the number of parameters studied to avoid accidents depends on the characteristics of the transport system, just as it depends on the possible exposure times. This leads, for example, to a graduation of requirements in terms of both reaction to fire and fire resistance.
Automotive transport, with its supposedly short exposure time, has the lowest requirements. Indeed, in the event of a fire, the safety system assumes that the driver can stop and evacuate, as the time required to immobilize the vehicle is very short.
In rail and maritime transport, the requirements are even more stringent. In addition to these fire behavior requirements, there are provisions for active systems (detection, extinguishing) and smoke characterization (opacity and toxicity). The two systems differ, however, in terms of the volumes involved and the evacuation philosophy. In the rail sector, people have to be brought to safety inside the vehicle and then outside, and the requirements are very high in terms of fire behavior and smoke toxicity. In the maritime sector, the ship is the last refuge. The emphasis is therefore on compromises between fire resistance and extinguishing systems. Strict requirements in terms of reaction to fire also apply to escape routes.
-
In the aeronautical field, two families of fire scenarios are considered. They entail two different constraints. The first involves limiting the ignitability of materials, which is achieved through very stringent requirements in terms of reaction to fire. The aim is to prevent an in-flight fire from starting, making evacuation impossible. The second family concerns materials used in cargo holds and fuselage, as well as seats in the event of a crash. The attack considered here is a very intense kerosene fire, the development of which must not jeopardize the evacuation of people.
In all cases, the primary objective remains the preservation of people through safe evacuation, by limiting the occurrence of fire, its development and its effects in the vicinity or in the environment.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!
KEYWORDS
Fire Safety | Standardization | Regulation | Material science | Testing
CAN BE ALSO FOUND IN:
Fire behavior testing in transport
Article included in this offer
"Safety and risk management"
(
460 articles
)
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Bibliography
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!