Conclusion

The results obtained by the different methods are very interesting. These tools allow flexible adaptation of the architecture initially proposed, enabling the reliability engineer to make effective adjustments to the different architectures newly considered. They also open the way to more creativity than other tools such as analytical calculation.

In addition, the various common functionalities, including the step-by-step simulator, make it possible to effectively homologate the model by ensuring its consistency. Finally, the power of Monte Carlo simulations produces reliable results for a sufficient number of simulations.

MissRdP has the undeniable advantage of an easy-to-understand interface. However, Petri net simulations can be time-consuming if you want to play a very large number of stories. On this point, AltaRica 3.0 is more optimal,...