Practical sheet | REF: FIC0532 V1

How to choose your risk analysis method: defining the right method for your objectives

Author: Olivier IDDIR

Publication date: January 10, 2012 | Lire en français

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


3. Choose between different approaches

3.1 Qualitative, semi-quantitative or quantitative method

Risk analysis methods can be divided into three categories:

  • Qualitative: the aim of the analysis is to provide an assessment of probability and severity (probable or improbable, high severity or low severity).

  • Semi-quantitative: the aim of the analysis is to give an order of magnitude of probability and severity (probability and severity classes are then used).

  • Quantitative: the aim of the analysis is to provide quantified probability values and a precise assessment of severity (e.g. a precise count of the number of people affected by a hazardous event).

In France, the regulatory...

You do not have access to this resource.

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference

A Comprehensive Knowledge Base, with over 1,200 authors and 100 scientific advisors
+ More than 10,000 articles and 1,000 how-to sheets, over 800 new or updated articles every year
From design to prototyping, right through to industrialization, the reference for securing the development of your industrial projects

This article is included in

Chemical risk prevention manager

This offer includes:

Knowledge Base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

Practical Path

Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills

Doc & Quiz

Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading

Subscribe now!

Ongoing reading
Choose between different approaches