6. Mistakes to avoid
Don't rush into patent protection. In short, the further removed a product or service is from a practical application of traditional science and technology, the less likely it is to be patentable at first sight. However, when faced with an innovation that appears to involve both technical and non-technical aspects, an examination of the case by a patent law specialist is always advisable before ruling out patent protection. There are two main reasons for this:
the boundary of technical character is both complex and evolving;
but above all, the "right of repentance" is very limited by the requirement of absolute novelty. Thus, by the time exploitation of the invention has begun, all or part of its content has generally been revealed, which can definitively close the door to patent protection. The decision...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Management and innovation engineering
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Mistakes to avoid
Bibliography
Also in our database
Websites
http://www.inpi.fr Institut national de la propriété industrielle website
http://www.epo.org European Patent Office website
Acronym
EPO: European Patent Office, the international organization responsible for granting European patents.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference