Monitoring vs. calibration
Practical sheet REF: FIC1433 V1

Monitoring vs. calibration

Author : Benoît BOUDIER

Publication date: March 10, 2015 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

Overview

Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.

Read the article

AUTHOR

  • Benoît BOUDIER: Head of Quality and Metrology, Aisne Departmental Laboratory for Analysis and Research – LDAR, LAON (02), France

 INTRODUCTION

When a laboratory wants to guarantee the results of a measurement process, it has always had its instruments calibrated on a regular basis. This historic principle led to the creation and harmonization of measurement units throughout the world. It is the basis of legal metrology. However, laboratories are not in the business of legal metrology, and their problem can be summed up in a few words: is my measurement adapted to what I need?

The aim of this fact sheet is to present the implementation of monitoring as a complement to calibration, for laboratories seeking to control their measurement processes. Without being exhaustive, this sheet describes various possible monitoring methods that laboratories can implement to reduce metrology costs while minimizing risks.

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Ongoing reading
Monitoring vs. calibration

Article included in this offer

"Laboratory quality and safety procedures"

( 140 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details