Should calibration be replaced by monitoring?
Monitoring vs. calibration
Practical sheet REF: FIC1433 V1
Should calibration be replaced by monitoring?
Monitoring vs. calibration

Author : Benoît BOUDIER

Publication date: March 10, 2015 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

2. Should calibration be replaced by monitoring?

There is no easy answer to this question. The real questions a laboratory needs to ask itself are "Why calibrate?" and "Why monitor?

The laboratory must carry out calibrations to ensure the accuracy of its measuring instruments, and to ensure their connection to the international system of units. This is also an essential requirement of accreditation, and will be systematically verified during external assessments carried out by the accreditation body. So there's no question of stopping calibrations.

The laboratory must also implement monitoring to ensure that its measurement processes do not drift over time, and that they maintain performance equivalent to the initial qualification. In other words, the laboratory must set up monitoring systems if it wants to be reassured every day about the performance of its measurement processes....

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Article included in this offer

"Laboratory quality and safety procedures"

( 140 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details