2. Should calibration be replaced by monitoring?
There is no easy answer to this question. The real questions a laboratory needs to ask itself are "Why calibrate?" and "Why monitor?
The laboratory must carry out calibrations to ensure the accuracy of its measuring instruments, and to ensure their connection to the international system of units. This is also an essential requirement of accreditation, and will be systematically verified during external assessments carried out by the accreditation body. So there's no question of stopping calibrations.
The laboratory must also implement monitoring to ensure that its measurement processes do not drift over time, and that they maintain performance equivalent to the initial qualification. In other words, the laboratory must set up monitoring systems if it wants to be reassured every day about the performance of its measurement processes....
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Laboratory quality and safety procedures
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Should calibration be replaced by monitoring?
Bibliography
Surveillance des processus de mesure : Ouvrage édité par le Collège Français de Métrologie
Optimizing calibration periodicity: the OPPERET method : Book published by the Collège Français de Métrologie
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference