Overview
ABSTRACT
Atomic force microscopy - AFM - and scanning electron microscopy - SEM - are nowadays widespread techniques for the characterization of nano-objects. In order to obtain reliable measurements at these scales, traceability and evaluation of the uncertainties associated with these measurements are essential. For the users of these techniques, one way to be aware of the metrological capabilities of their instruments is to participate in an interlaboratory comparison. The organization of such a comparison on a national scale, as well as its results and conclusions are reported in this article. This work has been realized in the frame of Club nanoMétrologie, the French National Network related to nanoscale characterization, created by the French National Metrology & Testing Laboratory (LNE) and the French National Competency Cluster in Nanoscience of CNRS (C’Nano – CNRS).
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHORS
-
Alexandra DELVALLÉE : Research engineer - Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais (LNE), Photonics-Energetics Division, nanometrology team, Trappes, France
-
Sébastien DUCOURTIEUX : Research engineer - Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais (LNE), Photonics-Energetics Division, nanometrology team, Trappes, France
INTRODUCTION
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) have become essential instruments, particularly for measuring the dimensions of nanoscale networks and objects. They are widely used in both industry and academia. However, to provide metrologically reliable information (traceable to the International System of Units, SI) and therefore comparable, these instruments need to be periodically calibrated using reference networks that are themselves calibrated.
After calibration, and in order to verify the accuracy of the measurement returned by the instrument, a comparison exercise can also be initiated. To this end, the user compares his measurements with those delivered by another user, another instrument or another laboratory.
This type of comparison can be launched on a much larger scale to verify the measurement capabilities of a set of users on a national or even international scale.
For AFM and MEB, these comparisons are generally initiated by metrology institutes, with participants often familiar with the concepts of uncertainty and traceability at . These comparisons are based on very strict protocols discussed between institutes.
In France, despite the country's highly developed range of instruments, no such comparison had been launched before 2014. For this reason, the "Instrumentation" working group of the Club nanoMétrologie, following numerous requests from its members, has set up a national intercomparison campaign to measure the dimensional characteristics of standard arrays by AFM and SEM. This club, created in 2011 and piloted by the Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais (LNE) and the Centre national de compétences...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!
KEYWORDS
SEM | Nanometrology | inter-laboratory comparison | gratings | AFM
Comparison of grating characteristic dimensions for AFM and SEM calibration
Bibliography
- (1) - SEPPÄ (J.), KORPELAINEN (V.), BERGSTRAND (S.), KARLSSON (H.), LILLEPEA (L.), LASSILA (A.) - Intercomparison of lateral scales of scanning electron microscopes and atomic force microscopes in research institutes in Northern Europe. - Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 25, n° 4, DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/25/4/044013...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!
Article included in this offer
"Mechanical and dimensional measurements"
(
126 articles
)
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources