Overview
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Olivier IDDIR: Risk quantification engineer – Member of TECHNIP's network of experts - Expertise & Modelling Department – TECHNIP, La Défense, France
INTRODUCTION
To prevent and limit risks, manufacturers need to implement safety barriers. There are various types of safety barriers, such as safety instrumented functions (SIF); implemented by safety instrumented systems (SIS), they have enjoyed growing popularity since the publication of standards governing their design, use, monitoring and maintenance over time (IEC 61508 and 61511 standards). The design of a SIS requires an assessment of the integrity level (SIL) of the RIS to demonstrate that the risks are under control. The aim is to demonstrate that the proposed RIS architectures can indeed achieve the required SIL levels. To do this, it is necessary to calculate the probability of failure for each RIS (PFD avg for systems in stress mode, or PFH for systems in continuous mode). The PDS method, widely used in the offshore industry (and particularly in Norway), is the answer to this need.
This article presents the principles of the PDS method and highlights the main differences with the approach presented in IEC 61508-6. More specifically:
it traces the origins of the method;
it presents the formulas for calculating the probability of failure under stress of a RIS (PFD avg );
it compares the PFD values avg obtained by applying the PDS method with those obtained by applying the formulas in IEC 61508-6.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!
PDS method
Article included in this offer
"Safety and risk management"
(
460 articles
)
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Bibliography
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!