Overview
ABSTRACT
This paper presents a state of the art comparison between the main geomembranes, flexible materials used in civil engineering to construct impervious containment systems. The geomembranes compared are: thermoplastic geomembranes (PVC, HDPE, LLDPE and polypropylene) elastomeric geomembranes (EPDM, CSPE) and bituminous geomembranes. The comparison focuses on: composition, dimensions, seaming, physical properties, mechanical properties, chemical resistance, durability and applications.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Jean-Pierre GIROUD: ECP Engineer, Doctor of Science - Member US National Academy of Engineering - Past President International Geosynthetics Society - Consulting engineer JP GIROUD, INC, USA - With the cooperation of Nathalie TOUZE-FOLTZ - Research Unit Manager Irstea
INTRODUCTION
Geomembranes are flexible, watertight materials used in civil engineering structures such as reservoirs, dams, canals, waste storage facilities, mine tailings repositories and many other types of structure. Today, it is impossible to envisage the construction of a civil engineering waterproofing system without at least considering the possibility of using a geomembrane. That's why it's so important to be familiar with geomembranes. This article on the comparison of geomembranes is designed to help engineers communicate with geomembrane suppliers, testing laboratories and experts.
This article presents a comparison of the main geomembranes currently in use: thermoplastic geomembranes (PVC, high-density polyethylene, linear low-density polyethylene and polypropylene), elastomeric geomembranes (EPDM and CSPE) and bituminous geomembranes. The comparison covers the following points:
composition ;
dimensions ;
assembly ;
physical properties ;
mechanical properties ;
chemical resistance ;
durability ;
use.
The comparisons are presented simply so that the reader can benefit from them without requiring advanced knowledge of material behavior. A few comparisons are presented in tabular form, but the bulk of the comparisons are presented in narrative form, which is easier to understand than deciphering endless tables of numerical values.
The comparisons are presented very briefly. For more details, please refer to the four preceding articles:
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!
KEYWORDS
geomembrane | waterproof materials | Textile Materials | building materials | civil engineering | waterproof containment
Comparison of geomembranes
Article included in this offer
"Public works and infrastructure"
(
88 articles
)
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Bibliography
- (1) - GIROUD (J.P.), PELTE (T.), BATHURST (R.J.) - Uplift of Geomembranes by Wind, Geosynthetics International. - Special Issue on Design of Geomembrane Applications, vol. 2, n° 6, pp. 897-952. (Errata, 1997, vol. 4, n° 2, pp. 187-207, and 1999, vol. 6, n° 6, pp. 521-522) (1995).
Other works
- ...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!