4. Mistakes to avoid
4.1 Don't make processes too complex
The main pitfall we see when initiating risk analyses is to systematically try to deploy a standard process to all projects/businesses. Put your energy where it belongs, and make dead ends explicit in your risk management plan. This also has to be weighed against the resources at your disposal.
So, for example, if you're working on a project with ten cases, it's a good idea to start by using the full process on the four riskiest cases, a leaner process (e.g. listing only the ten most critical risks) on the other four, and an expert provision on the remaining two.
This will be far more effective than embarking on poor, comprehensive analyses of the entire perimeter.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference
This article is included in
Design and engineering management
This offer includes:
Knowledge Base
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
Services
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Practical Path
Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills
Doc & Quiz
Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading
Mistakes to avoid
Reference standards
FD X50-117, AFNOR, April 2003 Project management – Risk management – Project risk management
ISO 31 000NF AFNOR, January 2010 Risk management - Principles and guidelines
NF ISO 21500 NF AFNOR, October 2012, Project management guidelines
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!
Already subscribed? Log in!
The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference