Overview
ABSTRACT
Companies, universities and municipalities have all bet on the development of fab labs. They want to promote the development of innovation projects through these spaces dedicated to learning and collaboration. This article presents the different facets of fab labs through a systematic questioning. After a quick introduction, an analysis of the typologies and resources available in fab labs is given. Their networking and modes of governance are discussed, then the article highlights the actors of these spaces and the projects that are realized within them. Finally, some perspectives on the future of these spaces are proposed.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHORS
-
Fabio CRUZ: Doctorate in Industrial Engineering - Research engineer - Innovative Processes Research Team, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
-
Alaa HASSAN: Senior Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering - Innovative Processes Research Team, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
-
Hakim BOUDAOUD: University Professor - Innovative Processes Research Team, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
INTRODUCTION
New production methods are at the heart of today's social challenges. Technological developments over the last thirty years have considerably increased the opportunities for users to innovate. The concept of the fab lab, short for "fabrication laboratory", is an example of this new approach, where the users of innovations will be those who design or even produce them themselves. This approach is associated with three major challenges: digital manufacturing, the creation of a vast repository of collective knowledge accessible to all via the Internet and, finally, the transition to personalized flexible production. As a result, the "maker" movement is growing rapidly around the world.
The number of fab labs has exploded since their creation in 2001 by Neil Gershenfeld, director of the Center for Bits and Atoms (CBA) laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Although they are often associated with other digital fabrication workshops, fab labs have their own identity and, above all, their own network. Indeed, fab labs offer the possibility of sharing resources and projects on a global scale within the network they form, unlike other creative spaces which are very often independent and unrelated. As Neil Gershenfeld puts it, the primary philosophy behind the creation of fab labs was "to get people all over the world to become protagonists of technology rather than mere spectators". In order to fully understand what underlies this idea, we propose here to use a contextual analysis enabling methodical and exhaustive questioning of the main characteristics of fab labs, namely the QQOQCP method (Who? What? Where? When? How? Why?). First, we'll look at the "what" and, more precisely, at what a fab lab is, its material and non-material components, and their diversity. Secondly, we'll look at the "why", and through this "for what", we'll present the projects developed in fab labs. After geolocating them, we'll go into detail about the management and governance methods that apply to them, and end with a few ideas about how they might evolve in the future.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!
KEYWORDS
innovation | open source | fab lab | third place
Fab labs: sharing spaces to boost innovation
Article included in this offer
"Management and innovation engineering"
(
434 articles
)
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Bibliography
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!