Overview
ABSTRACT
Steel structures subjected to cyclic loading can be impacted by fatigue-related problems. These cause progressive damage to structural details due to cracking from pre-existing flaws, which can result in massive failure. The first approach to preventing this effect is fatigue analysis, which is not always cost-effective. However, because the robustness of a detail and even more so that of a structure is usually not affected by the appearance of the first fatigue cracks, residual lifespan is often quite long. It may thus make economic sense to follow the cracking and monitor the robustness of the structure during cracking, rather than undertake expensive reinforcements or replacements straight away.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Mladen LUKIĆ : Chairman of CECM TC6 "Fatigue and Rupture" Convenor of CEN/TC250/SC3 WG9 "EN 1993-1-9" Research Project Manager CTICM (Saint-Aubin, France)
INTRODUCTION
A structure is made up of constructive details: it can fail when at least one of these constructive details reaches one of the ultimate limit states. Among these limit states is the fatigue limit state. This state reflects progressive cracking due to repeated loading over a very large number of cycles over time. Once a certain level of cracking has been reached, failure may occur.
The term "fatigue limit state" has not been formalized in the Eurocodes. However, other documents may refer to it.
Crack initiation necessarily starts from a defect. In the case of a part with a smooth appearance, the crack may originate from microscopic defects at the grain scale, or from edge defects due to flame cutting, drilling, etc., or it may originate from the surface of the part.
In the case of parts with welds, it's more likely to be a defect in the weld bead that initiates a crack (solid or gaseous inclusion, retassure, crack, etc.). These defects, combined with the notches caused by the more or less abrupt change in geometry due to the weld bead, are more significant than those in parts without welds.
Fatigue verification, which serves to protect against cracking, can prove decisive in the case of bridges, runways, very slender structures exposed to wind, or hydraulic structures. It is unnecessary for ordinary buildings subject to quasi-static actions such as wind or snow.
For fatigue testing, reference is generally made to the standard NF EN 1993-1-9 Design of steel structures – Part 1-9: Fatigue". Other Eurocodes, however, provide additional details of this verification for structures that may be susceptible to fatigue, such as bridges, towers, masts, chimneys or runways.
The calculation of crack propagation is discussed, but without much detail, in the NF EN 1993-1-10 or rather in its reference document .
Having to refer to different parts of Eurocode 1 for fatigue loads, and to different parts of Eurocode 3 for the verification...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!
KEYWORDS
fatigue | metallic construction | cracking | standards | steel | fracture mechanics | surface damage | | Eurocodes
Construction Métallique
Article included in this offer
"Public works and infrastructure"
(
88 articles
)
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Bibliography
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!