Overview
ABSTRACT
The current observation concerning construction or renovation projects of buildings is the persistence of a level of non-quality of the works which comes up against the objectives of sustainable development. As a result, the repair costs are significant and the environmental footprint of the building is struggling to be reduced.
These observations are indicative of the imperfect production process in construction projects.
This article is an opportunity to present a new methodology for quantifying objectively and prospectively the quality of a building upstream of its construction. This methodology then makes it possible to make more informed decision-making choices in favor of a more consistent final performance.
Read this article from a comprehensive knowledge base, updated and supplemented with articles reviewed by scientific committees.
Read the articleAUTHOR
-
Gilles THING LEO: Associate professor - Université Paris-Est – Institut de Recherche en Constructibilité - École Spéciale des Travaux publics, du bâtiment et de l'industrie (Paris, France)
INTRODUCTION
One of the recurring problems faced by the construction industry, whether in renovation or new-build, is the need to achieve a certain level of quality for structures when they are delivered. Yet this quality is most often seen as a subjective qualitative concept, or at best as the binary result of a compliance checklist drawn up on the basis of specifications. This leads to the following questions. Is the level of quality the same for two project players? Given that not all specifications are written in such a way as to precisely identify and value performance criteria, how can quality be assessed?
Moreover, even if this level of quality were to be objectively quantified by a methodology, the imperfection of the building production process must be taken into account: a building is always built in an open and uncertain environment. Indeed, construction projects can be seen as production processes whose aim is to provide the user with an expected level of quality, within the constraints of time and budget. This process can be disrupted by a number of hazards, which, from the point of view of building quality, result in degraded user performance compared with initial requirements. The two parameters taken into account in this article are the complexity of the work and the level of competence of those involved in the construction project.
This article is therefore an opportunity to propose a generic methodology for objectively quantifying the level of quality - in other words, the overall performance - of a construction project, right from the design stage. The prospective aspect of the methodology is important in the sense that it can serve as a decision-making tool for general contractors wishing to adopt technical choices that optimize the overall performance of their structures. It is here that the general framework for reflection can be underlined: the constructability of built structures. In fact, this proposal stems from a thesis carried out at the Institut de Recherche en Constructibilité of the École Spéciale des Travaux Publics, whose initiation was motivated by the need for methodologies and tools to make the concept of Constructibility operational.
At the end of the article, a glossary explains the main technical vocabulary used in this field.
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!
KEYWORDS
building | performance | decision support system | Constructibility
Decision support and performance-based approach for built structures
Article included in this offer
"Construction law and general management"
(
77 articles
)
Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees
A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources
Bibliography
- (1) - LOVE (P.E.D.), HOLT (G.D.), SHEN (L.Y.), LI (H.), IRANI (Z.) - Using systems dynamics to better understand change and rework in construction project management systems. - International Journal of Project Management, 20(6), 425–436 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00039-4 ...
Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!
Already subscribed? Log in!