Mistakes to avoid
Detecting sensitizing substances through animal and human testing
Archive REF: FIC1263 V1
Mistakes to avoid
Detecting sensitizing substances through animal and human testing

Author : Alain LOMBARD

Publication date: May 10, 2014 | Lire en français

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

12. Mistakes to avoid

12.1 Don't settle for a dubious test result

A dubious test result, especially if it doesn't classify your substance, risks passing on a sensitizing substance which can be revealed in employees who come into contact with your substance. However, in the case of abusive sensitizing classification, it can severely restrict the use of your substance unnecessarily.

Repeat the test as advised by the OECD in guideline no. 406: "The LLNA or MEST can be used in an initial phase of the evaluation of skin sensitization potential. If a test substance gives a positive result in either of these tests, it can be considered a potential sensitizer, and it may not be necessary to carry out a further test on the guinea pig.

However, if a negative result...

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Article included in this offer

"Chemical risk prevention manager"

( 218 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details