Distinguish between the different principles of an ERS
Impact Study: Health Risk Assessment

Add to my library

FIC0123 V1 Practical sheet

Distinguish between the different principles of an ERS


Impact Study: Health Risk Assessment

Author : Ismahane EL BAHLOUL

Publication date: February 10, 2012, Review date: November 14, 2016

Add to my library Add to my library

Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur You do not have access to this resource.
Request your free trial access! Free trial

Already subscribed?

1. Distinguish between the different principles of an ERS

1.1 Framework of the ERS

The ERS is based on five principles:

  • Principle of scientific caution: involves adopting, in the absence of established data, reasonably conservative assumptions defined for each case under consideration.

  • Precautionary principle: a high-level legal principle according to which “the absence of certainty, given current scientific and technical knowledge, must not delay the adoption of effective and proportionate measures aimed at preventing a risk of serious and irreversible environmental damage at an economically acceptable cost.”

  • Principle of proportionality: This principle requires consistency between, on the one hand, the level of detail in...

You do not have access to this resource.
Logo Techniques de l'Ingenieur

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource. Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed?


Ongoing reading
Distinguish between the different principles of an ERS

Article included in this offer

"Environment manager"

( 312 articles )

Complete knowledge base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

View offer details
Contact us