Practical sheet | REF: FIC1308 V1

Applying the earned value method to projects: benefits and pitfalls to avoid

Author: Laurent VINCI

Publication date: June 10, 2014 | Lire en français

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


6. Mistakes to avoid

6.1 Not choosing the right indicators

The main pitfall commonly encountered is that the assumptions used to calculate the indicators are not taken into account. For example, an IPD close to 100% is a good thing in the middle of a project, but not necessarily at the end (it must be associated with the calendar drift observed), while a CFE well above the BAA is a disaster, provided you know what method was used to calculate it.

Used properly, this method is a real plus on projects, but if it's poorly implemented and misused, it's easy to make indicators say anything and everything.

SCROLL TO TOP
You do not have access to this resource.

Exclusive to subscribers. 97% yet to be discovered!

You do not have access to this resource.
Click here to request your free trial access!

Already subscribed? Log in!


The Ultimate Scientific and Technical Reference

A Comprehensive Knowledge Base, with over 1,200 authors and 100 scientific advisors
+ More than 10,000 articles and 1,000 how-to sheets, over 800 new or updated articles every year
From design to prototyping, right through to industrialization, the reference for securing the development of your industrial projects

This article is included in

Design and engineering management

This offer includes:

Knowledge Base

Updated and enriched with articles validated by our scientific committees

Services

A set of exclusive tools to complement the resources

Practical Path

Operational and didactic, to guarantee the acquisition of transversal skills

Doc & Quiz

Interactive articles with quizzes, for constructive reading

Subscribe now!

Ongoing reading
Mistakes to avoid